The Independent Review into the Future Security of the National Electricity Market[i] chaired by Dr Alan Finkel AO recommended that by mid-2018, the Australian Energy Market Operator and the Australian Energy Market Commission should assess “the suitability of a ‘day-ahead’ market to assist in maintaining system reliability”. So what’s a “day-ahead market” and will it help?
A day-ahead market is a voluntary, financially-binding forward electricity market, in which buyers and sellers bid to trade volumes of electricity for the coming day. From these bids a dispatch schedule for each of the day’s intervals is prepared (subject to network security and other constraints), which is adjusted on the day for actual supply and demand and real-time constraints. This actual supply and demand is handled by a separate, real-time balancing market (like the existing National Electricity Market). Although participation in day-ahead markets is voluntary, typically a large proportion of the day’s volumes is covered by the trades.
The day-ahead market has the characteristics of both a financial market and a physical market. It is a financial market in that participants can buy and sell electricity on the market with no obligation for physical delivery, and a physical market in that the trade of electricity can be settled by the physical transfer of electricity.
Since it’s a forward market, it can help generators and loads to hedge against exposure to pricing and scheduling risks, and demand-side participation is also facilitated by having clear price signals well in advance of the time needed to act.
Day-ahead markets have been implemented in most European and North American markets. In Europe it is part of the “Price Coupling of Regions” project which is developing a harmonised European electricity market with a single price coupling solution used to calculate electricity prices across Europe on a day-ahead basis, respecting the capacity of the relevant network elements. The integrated European electricity market is expected to increase liquidity, efficiency and social welfare[ii].
In North America, day-ahead markets are present in most major markets, including California, New York, PJM (which coordinates electricity for 61 million people in 13 states and the District of Columbia) [iii] and the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT), which manages around 90 per cent of the state’s electricity load.
The benefits of a day-ahead market are that it:
The disadvantages are that:
Day-ahead markets are becoming increasingly common around the world, and provide a valuable means of improving the match between supply and demand. Although there will be costs involved in establishing and participating in the market, opportunities to enhance price discovery and increase market efficiency are to be embraced.
[i] Independent Review into the Future Security of the National Electricity Market: Blueprint for the Future, Commonwealth of Australia 2017
[ii] https://www.epexspot.com/en/market-coupling/pcr
[iii] PJM operates a wholesale electricity market that spans all or part of Delaware, Illinois, Kentucky, Maryland, Michigan, New Jersey, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Virginia, West Virginia and the District of Columbia.
[iv] Peak Load Management Alliance (2002) Demand Response: Principles for Regulatory Guidance
This year has showcased an increased level of volatility in the National Electricity Market (NEM). To date we have seen significant fluctuations in spot prices with prices hitting both maximum price caps on several occasions and ongoing growth in periods of negative prices with generation being curtailed at times. We took a closer look at why this is happening and the impact this could have on the grid in the future.
The market operator performs a vital role in managing the electricity and gas systems and markets across Australia. In WA, AEMO recovers the costs of performing its functions via fees paid by market participants, based on expenditure approved by the State’s Economic Regulation Authority. In the last few years, AEMO’s costs have sky-rocketed in WA driven in part by the amount of market reform and the challenges of budgeting projects that are not adequately defined. Here we take a look at how AEMO’s costs have escalated, proposed changes to the allowable revenue framework, and what can be done to keep a lid on costs.
The Australian Energy Regulator (AER) and the Essential Services Commission (ESC) have released separate papers to review and consult on changes to their respective regulation around payment difficulty. Many elements of the proposed changes focus on the interactions between an energy retailer’s call-centre and their hardship customers, we visited one of these call centres to understand how these frameworks are implemented in practice. Drawing on this experience, we take a look at the reviews that are underway.
Send an email with your question or comment, and include your name and a short message and we'll get back to you shortly.